From The Editor

Guest editorial: New poll shows transportation attitudes

Last month, we pondered how TriMet seemingly plans to reward the unfailing support of two decades by Inner Southeast Portland for light rail transit, which finally has led to construction of the once-cancelled and oft-postponed project, by reducing transportation service to north Westmoreland.

Nonetheless, that area still supports light rail – and hopes someday to have direct access to it, as does the Reed neighborhood, which both would be served from the “potential future” Harold Street Station.

Meantime, Clackamas County has shown considerably less enthusiasm for the project. That begs the question about how the many areas of the State of Oregon, as well as the Portland metro area, feel about public transportation. Our parent company, Community Newspapers/Pamplin Media, commissioned a statewide poll to find out. This month, our guest editorial, by reporter Jim Redden, discusses it here….

The 2015 Oregon Legislature is expected to consider a transportation funding package that will include an increase in the state gas tax. The goal is to provide more money for state, county and city transportation projects.

But what priorities should be funded if the state raises more money for transportation? Should the focus be on roads and bridges, or should the state put more money into mass transit and other methods of moving people around? The answers to those questions may depend on where you live – as Portland residents continue to favor trains and buses, while many other areas in Oregon want to see better roads for their personal automobiles.

Those conclusions can be gleaned from the 2013 Oregon Value & Beliefs Project survey, which asked thousands of state residents to say how they would spend transportation dollars.

Unlike most polls, this survey asked questions about priorities with cost implications – informing respondents that the priorities they chose meant they were willing to raise taxes or reduce other services to fund them.

The top priority overall was maintenance of roads and highways, which was rated very important or somewhat important by 72 percent of poll respondents. Public transportation such as buses and trains came in second, with 55 percent support. And new roads and highways came in third, with 49 percent.

The slight preference for public transportation over new roads and highways might seem surprising, given recent controversies over light rail and the fact that most Oregonians depend on motor vehicles for day-to-day travel.

But an analysis conducted by DHM Research, the company that conducted the survey, points to one possible explanation.

“Support for public transit may be due in part to emerging changes in how people feel about cars. A broad range of surveys in recent years suggests that people are less likely to view cars as a pathway to freedom and mobility, or as an expression of their personal identity”, according to the analysis.

However, support for mass transit varies greatly, depending on whether the person lives in urban Portland, the suburbs, or in rural areas. Outside the state's largest city, residents seem to favor a balance between transit and automobiles.

DHM Research provided the Pamplin Media Group with a survey breakdown for those who live in or near the boundaries of Portland, Beaverton, Canby, Forest Grove, Gresham, Hillsboro, Lake Oswego, Molalla, Sherwood, Tigard, Tualatin, West Linn, Wilsonville, Oregon City, or the rest of Clackamas County.

Unsurprisingly, Portland residents are the most enthused about mass transit, with 74 percent indicating a willingness to spend more money on buses and trains. However, this support dwindles the farther you get away from Portland.

 Looking at the state as a whole, 53 percent of respondents say they support more transit funding, but that seeming majority is hardly uniform in its political makeup.

“Democrats and Republicans feel very differently about this issue, however. About two-thirds of Democrats support public transportation investment, while just one-third of Republicans do,” according to the DHM analysis.

Democrats dominate the Portland area and Willamette Valley, so it's no surprise that support for transit is strong there – 55 and 53 percent respectively. It is weaker in Central Oregon (48 percent) and Eastern Oregon (45 percent). But it is also strong in Southern Oregon (54 percent), where Ashland is a Democratic enclave.

Plus, it's not as if there's no support for road construction. This option is favored by 37 percent of those in the Portland area, 39 percent in the Willamette Valley, 45 percent in Central Oregon, 46 percent in Eastern Oregon and 38 percent in Southern Oregon.

Support for transit also varies within the Portland area. After Portland, the highest level of  for mass transit is found in Lake Oswego, at 61 percent. Based on the DHM research, here is how other communities compare in their support for mass transit projects:

• Beaverton: 54 percent support.

• Canby and Molalla: 52 percent support.

• Forest Grove: 56 percent support.

• Gresham: 46 percent support.

• Hillsboro: 52 percent support.

• Sherwood, Tigard and Tualatin: 57 percent support.

• West Linn-Wilsonville: 51 percent support.

• Oregon City and the rest of Clackamas County: 56 percent support.

Conversely, support for more money for new roads and highways is smallest in Portland – 22 percent – and greater outside the city. New road and highway spending is favored by 40 percent in Beaverton; 47 percent in Canby and Mollalla; 42 percent in Forest Grove; 44 percent in Gresham; 45 percent in Hillsboro; 38 percent in Sherwood, Tigard, and Tualatin; 40 percent in West Linn and Wilsonville – and 40 percent in Oregon City and the rest of Clackamas County.

Of course, support in polls doesn't always translate into new projects. Although one major metro-area transit project is nearing completion, two have been stopped in recent years, and a fourth is facing a voter backlash.

The Portland-to-Milwaukie MAX line project is on schedule to open in September of 2015. When finished, it will extend light-rail service from the southern edge of Portland State University to downtown Milwaukie. It will also close the Portland Streetcar loop over the Tilikum Crossing Bridge across the Willamette River between South Waterfront and OMSI. But in 2012 the Lake Oswego City Council blocked an extension of the Portland Streetcar that had been studied for years; and the 2013 Washington Legislature killed a new light-rail line between Portland and Vancouver when it refused to fund its share of the Columbia River Crossing.

Planning is underway on the Southwest Corridor Project that envisions a high capacity transit line between Portland and Tualatin. But a majority of Tigard voters have approved a measure requiring a public vote on any new transit line in their city, such as the one under consideration as part of the Southwest Corridor Project. Tualatin voters will be asked to approve or reject a similar measure in September.

Another transit project is also in the works in Southeast Portland. Planning has begun on a potential new line between Portland and Gresham along portions of Powell Boulevard and Division Street. The Powell-Division project overseen by Metro, the elected regional government, could be the first bus rapid transit project in the area.

Jim Redden, Portland Tribune

Letters to the Editor

Friends of Trees wants YOU


Did you know that urban street and yard trees increase air and water quality, improve neighborhood livability, help mitigate stormwater, boost property values and help beautify neighborhoods? Would you like to see more trees in your neighborhood? If you are reading this and you answered yes to either question, you might want to consider becoming a Friends of Trees Neighborhood Coordinator (NC)!

Neighborhood Coordinators are our most vital connection to the Southeast Portland neighborhoods where we plant trees. NCs are volunteers who are absolutely critical to the mission and success of Friends of Trees, and who work closely with staff members to help answer questions from neighborhood tree purchasers, and create outreach strategies and organize planting day logistics. The most important piece of the equation is the willingness to communicate with your neighbors and be excited about having more trees in your neighborhood – and, of course, have fun doing it!

No experience is necessary. We'll train you in all aspects of this role and support you throughout the planting season. We’d welcome support in any neighborhood, but both Eastmoreland and Mt. Scott-Arleta are in particular need this year. If you are interested in the role, or have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me in the Neighborhood Trees Program at 503/467-2533. We hope you can join the team!

Erica Timm
via e-mail


Disliked the attention


As I turned the pages of the July BEE, I was shocked to see our house shown in Eileen Fitzsimons article titled “New Homes”… Many neighbors I have spoken with thought that we knew about this article before it was published. We did not. How can THE BEE publish photos, etc., without the person’s knowledge??

Laura Johnson

EDITOR’S NOTE: Photos taken from public property, such as the street, can be taken and published freely. You would apparently be surprised to learn that all newspapers constantly take photos for use in news articles without asking anybody’s permission! In this case, Ms. Fitzsimons has been illustrating her local history articles with local photos for longer than this editor has been with THE BEE, which is 14 years. Her intent in this particular article was to show how some of the new construction in the area has enhanced rather than hurt the historic nature of the community, so she probably will be surprised to learn that you disliked that she liked what you had done with your home.

Letters to the Editor may be submitted via e-mail by clicking HERE.

All letters to the editor are subject to editing for clarity and available space, and all letters become property of THE BEE.


Comments? News tips?

Click here to e-mail us!

Note to readers: At some point, this, our original Internet website, will be replaced at this web address by our new website, as part of the Community Newspapers group. At that time, you will still be able to access this, our original -- and smartphone-friendly -- website, if you save this address: You'll still have your choice of which one to visit!